Review: Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter Lite

Earlier this year I started to have problems with my Internet connection. As most people do, I blamed my cable company. I filed a trouble ticket and a technician came out. He checked the signals, replaced a few connectors and called it good. After he came out, I still experienced blips where I completely lost connectivity for up to 30 seconds. The tech suggested I try replacing my router. As I’ve never had problems with Apple routers (I have a Time Capsule), I basically said “whatever”.

While I still wanted to blame the cable company, I went ahead and order a TP-Link Archer 8 router from Costco.com to give it a whirl. The router was easy to setup and I had it running for a week. After about a week, the web UI stopped responding and required a reboot; support had no idea why and just suggested I reboot the router when it happened. I didn’t like that answer as I like routers to just work, so I returned it to Costco. (Another issue I had with it is that it had an on/off switch; there doesn’t need to be a power switch on a router.) Other than the web UI not responding, it seemed to work well for the week I used it.

I decided to take a stab at another router; this one was a Netgear router that I bought at the Costco store. Configuration was easy (and it did have a power switch which I didn’t like) and it ran for about a day before the 2.4 GHz network stopped responding and required a reboot. This was not good as my son was quite upset that his Squeezebox Radio wouldn’t work when he got up. This router didn’t get a second chance and went right back to Costco.

My luck was kind of running out with routers. I remembered that I had backed the Securifi Almond+ on Kickstarter and I had it sitting on my shelf. I fired it up to use as a router. Setup, like the others, was easy and I was up and running. I went through a few software updates and it performed quite well for well over 2 months. I didn’t, however, take the last few software updates as there were reports of problems with them. I had wanted an integrated automation hub/router, but the automation stuff isn’t up to what I want, yet.

A colleague and I had been discussing routers over this whole time and we were both convinced that the Apple AirPort Extreme/Time Capsule wasn’t the fastest router. (Routers have processors in them and have to make decisions about where each packet goes; the more traffic going through the network and the more devices, the more processing power a router needs.) He had been reading about the Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter Lite and decided to pick one up. The router is less than $100 and is only a router and not a WiFi access point.

I’ve used a Ubiquiti Networks access point in the past and the performance for price was phenomenal. When my colleague got his router and started using it, I got a text that said “Holy cow, this router is fast!”. He’s on a 75 Mbps/75 Mbps FIOS connection. A few days after he got the router, I decided to bite the bullet and get one.

This router is definitely not a router for the average consumer. As I’ve configured Linux networking for almost 20 years, I wasn’t intimidated by the box. The web UI on this is much better than any other web UI I’ve seen for a device like this. It has pretty graphs and the latest firmware uses deep packet inspection (DPI) to show you the bandwidth used by each device and what services the devices are using. Initial setup was a little trickier as I had to upgrade the firmware (new firmware came out the day before I received mine), add a new admin user, figure out which wizard to use, and change a few network settings. This router has 3 ports; it is NOT a switch, so the 3 ports are designed for 3 separate network interfaces. One interface is the WAN (cable modem) while the other 2 are for separate LANs. I configured 1 LAN for my home network and the other LAN for my Ooma; no real reason to separate the Ooma, but I had the port available and I can monitor bandwidth for it separately.

While everything worked fine for my wired network, I had to reconfigure my Time Capsule to simply be a wireless access point which wasn’t hard.

Screen Shot 2015 07 09 at 4 49 46 PM

After the setup, I was pleased as punch with the graphs and the performance was quite snappy for accessing web pages. While most people would be done and happy, I wasn’t content! I wanted to get my guest WiFi network working. In a separate post, I’ve written about the experience.

Now my router has been running for 1 week without any hiccups. I’ve done some reconfiguring, but have not had to restart the router. This is NOT common in the consumer routers I’ve touched, but is very much UNIX like where you can bring network interfaces down and then back up. This router has so many options that I’ve only scratched the surface on what it can do. It is definitely a geek’s tool.

Screen Shot 2015 07 09 at 4 51 37 PM

Pros

  • Very fast router.
  • Excellent web user interface.
  • Extremely flexible (VLANs, VPNs, etc.)
  • Vibrant user community.
  • Well supported with firmware updates.

Cons

  • Some pieces are not very user friendly.
  • Command line need to configure some things.
  • Not a full fledged switch, so a separate switch will be needed.
  • Not a WiFi access point, so a separate WiFi access point is needed.
  • Limited documentation.

Summary

This router is an excellent router for someone that has a networking background and likes to tinker. The configurations are endless and can be tuned to the needs of almost any small setup. It is NOT a consumer router. For my uses, it is excellent and appears to be quite stable. The performance is more than I can ask for on my 50 Mbps/5 Mbps connection and I wish I had more bandwidth to really put this router through its paces.

I am looking forward to the web UI enhanced for IPv6 when that is rolled out. While the router handles IPv6 through the command line, there are only a few pieces in the web UI to support it. If Ubiquiti keeps up with the firmware, I expect to see this in the future.

If you have a really fast connection and feel that your router isn’t snappy, something like this router could be the ticket. However, don’t get this expecting it to be completely plug and play. If you have never used ipfilter or similar firewall tool and don’t know what to do with separate ethernet interfaces named eth0, eth1, and eth2, stay far away from this router.

Review: Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

Last week a friend of mine came to visit and during some downtime, he had a Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover. (His was for a larger iPad.) I thought it looked interesting and decided to get one for my iPad mini. Of course, I neglected to realize that the keyboard would be a lot smaller because it was for an iPad mini, doh!

When the keyboard arrived, I was impressed with how little bulk it added and really like how the keyboard sits in the stand. As a cover and a stand, the keyboard cover works well. The keyboard is a little small for touch typists, but after a few days, I’m starting to get used to it and am, in fact, writing this review using the keyboard. The biggest problem I’m finding is that I feel like the keyboard is shifted slightly offset from center causing me to shift my hands. The smaller keys aren’t for everyone, but I’m finding that I can fairly easily type on it while it is on my lap or on a desk,

It is easy to forget that it is a Bluetooth keyboard and has to be charged. Logitech estimates that with 2 hours per day usage, you can get about 3 months of usage. Unfortunately the only way you know the power level is to wait until the power light blinks and at that point, it is down to 5%. The cover uses magnets like the smart cover to turn the iPad on/off when the cover is opened and closed which is clever as I’ve only seen it in Apple’s covers. In addition, it uses magents to hold the iPad in the stand.

Pros

  • Compact.
  • Provides a protective cover for the iPad.
  • Rechargeable.
  • Connects easily to the iPad.
  • The keys have enough travel for typing.

Cons

  • It is a little small and may be hard for some people to type. (The one for the other iPads will be different.)
  • Keys appear to be shifted which can make it hard to type.
  • No indicator for battery remaining.

Summary

The Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover is going to be an excellent addition to my iPad mini and make it even easier to leave my laptop behind on trips or to leave it in my office at night when I want to write. If you have big hands and use an iPad mini, I suspect that this keyboard won’t be a good choice for you. For a bigger iPad, the keyboard will, of course, be larger and easier to use. At the list price of $70, I think this could be overpriced. However, I got mine off Amazon as an openbox item for $32 and for that price, I think it was a good purchase. This week my personal MacBook Pro is going in for repair (it is part of Apple’s extended warranty program for graphics card issues) and this keyboard is going to help me with my computer withdrawl :-).

For other iPads, the versions of the keyboard may prove to be easier to use, so if you’re looking to make your iPad your only computer or a travel device, you should definitely check out this keyboard.

Review: Kanex iDevice Collapsable Stand

Awhile ago I found a stand I liked for my iPad. Since then, I’ve switched to an iPad mini and the stand no longer fits the iPad. So I looked for a replacement. When the iPad came out, people were using all kinds of things including binder clips to make stands, so I didn’t need anything really complicated. I stumbled upon the Kanex iDevice Collapsable Stand and for the price, what did I have to lose?

The stand is extremely simple and does its job. It is easy to carry and I can throw it in my bag. I used it all the time (more on why I’m no longer using it in another post) and it served its purpose. There isn’t a whole lot to it, and it just works.

Pros

  • Inexpensive.
  • Adjustable.
  • Compact.

Cons

  • None

Summary

If you’re looking for a simple stand, the Kanex stand works well. There are more complex stands out there that cost more money, but I definitely recommend this for anyone looking for a simple stand.

Review: Shoulderpod S1

On each vacation I’ve taken in the last few years, I’ve taken a compact digital camera along with my iPhone. However, with each iPhone revision, the camera gets so much better that I reconsider my choice to take a camera. The camera has a few features that the iPhone doesn’t have, but the differences are so minor.

The only thing that I seem to miss using the iPhone is simply how it feels and how easy it is to hold. I had read about the Shoulderpod S1 as a grip for the iPhone. I didn’t back it on KIckstarter, but it made it “to the big leagues” as I found it on Amazon.

I ordered it a few days for my last vacation and when it arrived, I adjusted it for my phone and tried it out. Its premise is pretty simple; provide a hand held mount for your smartphone. Operating it is easy; just adjust the screw and put your iPhone in it. I used it for a bunch of shots and being able to hold the phone without the fear of dropping it and being able to stablize it was very convenient. I didn’t take many movies, but the movies I did were less shaky. I also used it to take a timed shot and it worked well mounted on my Gorillapod mount.

The biggest “problem” with the Shoulderpod is that when I had it attached, I couldn’t really fit my phone in my pocket, so I kept taking it off my iPhone and reattaching it. This was a little inconvenient, but I’m not sure it was the fault of the little device.

Pros

  • Makes it easy to hold an iPhone.
  • Supports my iPhone 6 and other smartphones; very adjustable.
  • Standard tripod mount allows it to work with GorillaPod and other tripods.

Cons

  • Some pieces are made out of plastic which made lead to issues down the line with reliability.
  • Taking the Shoulderpod on and off is a little cumbersome and leaving it on doesn’t fit in my pocket.

Summary

The Shoulderpod S1 makes a great addition to any smartphone user that relies exclusively on his or her phone for taking pictures on vacations or even for taking photos and videos of school functions, Holding my hold with just just a few fingers always has me nervous and the Shoulderpod’s grip takes this away and stabilizes pictures. I’m sure others have gotten good at taking smartphone pictures, but I think that the Shoulderpod will make it even easier to take good pictures.

The price isn’t that much and is a good addition to my travel bag. I will need to find a better way to deal with it so that I don’t take it on or off, but I consider that a minor issue.

Review: Twelve South HiRise Deluxe iPhone Stand

One of themes in my backings on Kickstarter was the search for a stand for my iPhone. Unfortunately none of the products I backed were decent quality and a waste. I’ve read good things about the Twelve South HiRise Deluxe stands and decided to splurge (they’re a bit more expensive than other stands). I was skeptical when I ordered it as the cable wasn’t integrated in the stand and required me to supply my own; this didn’t seem like a great design, but I was willing to give it a shot.

When I got the stand, I was impressed that it was designed for different thickness cases and the holder for the Lightning connector was quite solid. Setup was easy and I adjusted it for my case. I’ve been using it daily since September and it has performed flawlessly. I drop my phone in it and it charges; not much more to say about it. Since I work from home, I leave my phone in the stand most of the time and use Hey Siri to make my conference calls. It is a great angle for viewing and does well for conference calls. I should have gone with this stand instead of backing various Kickstarter projects (however, this stand uses a Lightning connector; I’m not sure it would have worked as well with the 30 pin connector).

Pros

  • Handles different sized cases.
  • Solid (it doesn’t fall over).
  • Good angle and height for holding up iPhone.
  • Doesn’t put extra stress on connector as phone is resting on the stand and not the connector.

Cons

  • A little more expensive than the average stand.

Summary

This is an excellent stand for iPhones with the Lightning connector. I’m not sure how well it would work with the iPad mini like it claims. The cost is probably a little more than most people want to spend on a stand, but it is quite easy to just drop my iPhone into it when I’m at my desk. I’d definitely purchase this again.

Review: Anker 5-Port USB Charger

These days just about everything is powered by USB, and I never seem to have enough ports to charge the items. If I used individual chargers, I’d have a bunch of chargers on power strips and when I travel, I’d have a bunch of pieces to bring. So, when I started reading about multiple port chargers that would handle iPhones as well as the increased power required for iPads, I was quite intrigued. After further research, some chargers required me to plug iPads into certain ports and other devices into the other ports. This is cumbersome and when I saw the Anker® 40W 5-Port USB Charger where it would intelligently figure out what output is required for each port, I jumped at this.

The charger is pretty compact and its operation is simple, plug it in. I’ve been using it for travel on a number of trips and it is a real lifesaver. When I travel with my family, we have 3 iPads, 2 iPhones, my Pebble watch, and an external iPhone battery. While I don’t have to charge all at once, it is quite handy to plug in 5 devices. It works as advertised and I haven’t had any problems with it. Some reviews have indicated that the device arrived dead or overheated. I haven’t seen those and it just works.

Pros

  • Compact
  • Handles multiple devices

Cons

  • None

Summary

The only question about this is how many should you get? I recommend getting at least one to throw in a suitcase so it is always ready for travel. Getting a second one to leave on a desk isn’t a bad idea either. While I don’t have an Anker on my desk (I have a different one that is of lesser quality), having a charger on my desk is quite handy.

These do go on sale for about $20-$25 periodically, so I wouldn’t pay more than that, but if you travel with more than 1 device, this is a great addition to any travel pack.

Finding the perfect streaming media box

For years, I’ve been looking for the best way for my wife and me to watch TV. We haven’t had cable TV in years, so up until about 2 years ago, we strictly watched what I recorded on my Mac Mini using El Gato’s EyeTV. I switched to using the HDHomeRun instead of the EyeTV tuners and things have been running flawlessly. One day my wife mentioned trying Netflix and we tried it out on my Nintendo Wii. While it worked OK, the quality wasn’t great and the user interface was kind of weird because of the WiiMote controller.

At that time, I decided to get an Apple TV (2nd generation of the small box). It worked quite well for Netflix and managed to setup some scripts to export all the TV content we recorded into iTunes and then use the Apple TV to play it. The system worked and I had no complaints. Almost another year went by and when we moved into our new house, we got a new Vizio 50″ TV. Since we already had Amazon Prime, I thought I would check out some of the Amazon Prime Videos available using the Vizio TV. The interface on the TV for Amazon was so poor, it was practically unusable.

I had heard good things about the Roku, so I decided to give it a shot. It handled Netflix and Amazon Prime. In addition, there was a Plex app for the Roku. Even though I had played with Plex in the past, I wasn’t all that familiar with it. I installed the server software on my Mac Mini, tweaked my scripts that exported the EyeTV shows to the Apple TV and had the shows exported to Plex.

So now I had Netflix, Amazon Prime, as well as my TV shows working on the Roku. Everything worked well and is pretty easy to use.

Why mess with something that works? Well, a friend of mine had an Amazon Fire TV and said he liked it. I’ve read mixed things about it and didn’t have a need to get one. About a week ago, one showed up at my door with a game controller, so what did I have to lose?

The Fire TV is a bit different than the Roku and with Plex installed on the Fire TV, I should be able to get the same content I already had. After a week playing with the Fire TV, I have to say that it has potential. The Plex app, however, needs a bit of work. It is an Android app with few customizations other than working with the game controller and remote. In particular, the Plex server generates media index files which lets me see thumbnails while I’m fast forwarding so I can also stop the forwarding when the show starts.

Unlike the other boxes, the Fire TV runs Android and has a pretty wide selection of apps, including games available for it. I’ve used some Amazon credit to purchase some games and have downloaded a few free ones. While I’m not a hardcore gamer, I’ve been pretty impressed with the gaming ability of the TV. I’ve already wasted a ton of time playing games, so it must say something about the box! The game controller works well not only for games, but also for navigating the menus; the joystick makes it quite easy to quickly move around.

As much as I wanted the Fire TV to replace my Apple TV and Roku, it doesn’t quite do that. It could almost replace the Roku if Plex worked better; Plex for Android was designed for a mobile device and as I wrote earlier, hasn’t really been updated for the Fire TV. I am using my Fire TV for Amazon Prime, Netflix, and gaming. The Apple TV has 1 feature that neither of the other 2 has and that is AirPlay for the times when I want to throw my iPad or iPhone’s screen up on a big display.

The battle of the Bluetooth tags

Several years ago, I started looking into Bluetooth LE as it would let me work with devices and potentially get something in the app store without having to become an Apple partner and get a device certified. While I haven’t released anything for the app store, I’ve done some dabbling with the technology.

One of the areas that seems to have a lot of interest is in “beacons” to provide finer grained location data for apps. A simple example is putting a “tag” on a set of keys and knowing when you’re close to them. This seems quite popular and a lot of companies are getting into this area. In the past year or so, I’ve collected a number of different “tags” to compare the apps and see how they function. For the most part, the tags are advertised as helping you find lost items. At this point in my life, I rarely lose things, so my interest in these is more academic than practical.

I’ve purchased tags from StickNFind, tile, and XYFindIt. I’ve had the StickNFind ones the longest, but never got around to writing a review; the other 2 sets just arrived.

To begin with, all three have this concept that if you lose your whatever out in public, someone else with the app will somehow come within close proximity to your device, receive the ping from the tag and then upload the location to their cloud server. To me, this seems like one of the stupidest features as it requires a large number of people to have the app running in order to blanket the world with the receivers for the beacons. They should all just cut this out and forget the cloud component of their “service”. I have no idea why people think this is a good idea, but it is ridiculous.

Moving onto the hardware. All 3 devices look a little different and take slightly different approaches. The XYFindIt and the StickNFind devices both have replaceable batteries; the tile is a sealed device and they expect you to replace the tile about every year. There have been numerous complaints about the devices arriving DOA because the batteries were dead. I think that the tile is very short sighted in this as the tiles themselves aren’t cheap and if they expect you to replace them yearly, I’m not sure who will do this. Having said that, I like the design of the tile devices. They are flat and have a built in place to put them on a keychain. The StickNFind comes with a piece of plastic that you stick onto the back of the device and then put that on a key ring. The XYFindIt devices are hexagonally shaped and have a hole for a keyring.

The tile has the best looking hardware design. In addition, the tile’s audible beep when finding it is more pleasant than the other two. However, the lack of a replaceable battery keeps me from feeling completely comfortable with it.

IMG 3792

From left to right: StickNFind, XYFindIt, tile.

While all the hardware is basically the same (a fob/tag that you hook on a keychain and beeps when you alert it), the software you install on your phone is where the differences are more noticeable.

Starting with the StickNFind, the app resembles a radar (because that is such a great analogy in trying to locate something). The biggest problem with this is that the Bluetooth LE ranging is so inaccurate, the radar image is useless.

StickNFind

The app doesn’t use any standard controls and I have no idea what most of it means. The app is basically useless when all I want to do is find my tag. You can send out a request to the tag if you’re close enough to sound the beeper, but I can’t tell if it is in range. Also, I found the app to be flakey and took awhile to realize that I was logged into my account (I’d prefer not to have accounts for these things as they’re not really needed). I’m not sure how useful Maps is (this applies to all the apps) as most of the time that I’m looking for something, the chances of me leaving it somewhere else are practically zero; if I did leave it, what are the chances that I’ll be able to recover it?

Moving onto the XYFindIt app, I really wanted to like it as it is the newest of them all and I would have thought that they had the most time to see what others did wrong and make it better.

Screen Shot 2014 11 30 at 7 39 14 PM

The dots around the outside move around and act like a compass, I think, but I doubt they actually mean anything because if I recall correctly, given the granularity of Bluetooth LE for location, it is extremely hard to be able to tell what direction the tag is located. Also, the icons are pretty strange on this screen. I’m not sure why there is an eject icon for more and I couldn’t tell if tapping the speaker icon turned the beeper on or turned it off. Lastly, the dB level is not accurate and pointless. Furthermore, the map shows the last places your tag has been; my tags have never left my desk and has given me 6 different locations for them. Not all that helpful.

Lastly, the app for tile. This app is clean and gets to the point of the tags, finding your stuff.

Screen Shot 2014 11 30 at 7 38 40 PMScreen Shot 2014 11 30 at 7 38 48 PM

I really like the simple interface and the “Find” button. If I’m close enough to hear the beep, then I can find it. I don’t really need the fancy “warmer”, “colder”, etc. For the most part, I found that the Find button did connect to the tag and played the pleasant sound; that’s more than I can say for the other tags.

Normally I list pros and cons of products, but I’m going to skip that and go onto the summary.

Summary
As much as I wanted to find some tags to use to help my wife find her keys and to put in my suitcase in case I get separated from it, I’m not convinced that any of these products is worth the money. The tile is close to being the device I’d recommend, but it was kind of hit or miss in connecting, the global find “feature” is a turn off, and the non-replaceable battery makes it a non-starter. The other 2 products have poor quality apps and a design that isn’t as ascetically pleasing as the tile.

When my tiles die, I’m going to attempt to crack them open and see if I can put them back together. They have so much promise, but if you want 4 of them, it’s basically $70 per year to use them.

Save your money and wait for the next round of Bluetooth LE tags.

Review: SportRX

Earlier this year I came to a realization that I was putting in my contact lenses on most days only to run. I’m not sure why it took so long as I work from home and in most weeks, I tend not to leave the house except to run. So I was wearing my contacts for a few hours a day which has become old. I decided to look into prescription running glasses, glasses with a little bit of a wrap. I found SportRX online and realized that they were less than 5 minutes from my house.

I wandered into the storefront one day and a very helpful optician, Sarah, gave me 3 choices because of my prescription. My eyes aren’t great and I can’t see anything without glasses. I left to see if my optometrist could match the price as I’d be able to use my vision insurance there (VSP is strange and can only be used at optometrist owned shops from what I understand). A few days later, they got back to me and basically said that they could make the glasses, but couldn’t guarantee that they’d work as the wrap requires a different way of making the lens. I wasn’t willing to take the risk, so I went back to SportRX.

Again I walked into SportRX and went ahead and ordered Rudy Project Horus frames with prescription lenses. The whole package wasn’t cheap, but I was super excited to get them. I received email about 2 weeks later that they had arrived and I went in to pick them up. I tried on the glasses and almost fell over because they made me disoriented. The optician, Tim, took a look and said he’d talk to the lab. I chatted with him a few days later after I checked my order online and the lab had made the lenses wrong and they were going to remake them.

A few more weeks went by and my new sunglasses arrived by UPS. I put on the sunglasses and felt a little dizzy. However, I thought my prescription was a bit different. I wore them a number of times and ran with them a few times, but couldn’t get used to them. I’m not sure exactly what was the problem, but decided to return them. (SportRX has a very generous return policy which is one of the reasons I decided to give them a try.) When I went back, I was given the option of a refund or could try a different frame. A third optician, Rob, assisted me and just like the other two, was extremely helpful. I opted to try another frame; I was assured that if they didn’t work, I could still get a full refund. While the frames I chose, Oakley Chainlink, weren’t as sporty as the Rudy Project ones, my options seemed quite limited. This time when I went in, I took my son in to take a look around. The receptionist said Rob was on the phone and offered us something to drink as well as the opportunity to play tabletop shuffleboard which was very kind. I showed my son how to play and he was entertained. After Rob finished helping me, he brought out a pair of kids sunglasses and gave them to my son to keep. This extra special touch reinforced my decision to give SportRX a try.

I received my new sunglasses 2 weeks ago and have been wearing them running, driving, and all the usual activities where I normally would have worn contacts and non-prescription sunglasses. At first they seemed a little weird like the last pair, but now that I’ve gotten used to them, they’re fine. They’re a little different than my regular glasses, but not enough to return them. I feel a bit free in that I don’t have to put in my contacts when I leave the house; just grab the sunglasses and go.

The major problem I experienced (and it has nothing to do with SportRX or the sunglasses) is that I was wearing my sunglasses driving and it started pouring rain; I had to pull over to the side of the road to swap glasses as I can’t see a thing without them.

Now that I have a pair of prescription sunglasses and a pair of regular glasses, I need a murse to hold them both!

Pros

  • Large selection of frames for people with not awful vision
  • Extremely friendly and helpful staff

Cons

  • Higher prescriptions may have problems getting good lenses made
  • Choices are limited in high prescriptions
  • Cost; prescription sunglasses that are sporty are not cheap

Summary

Despite the problems with my sunglasses, I had a good experience with SportRX and would recommend them. The money back guarantee and their willingness to work with me made the experience pleasant. My only disappointment is that my eyes are bad enough that my choices on frames were limited and the lenses didn’t turn out exactly as I had hoped (in order to reduce the wrap, the lenses stick out a bit on the sides).

Review: JayBirds BlueBuds X Headphones

For years I’ve been running with my iPhone and up until a bit over 2 years ago used wired headphones. The main problem with the wired headphones (besides the wire) is that the sweat that got into the controls would kill them requiring me to replace them every few months. This was a bit annoying and I finally did research and settled on a pair of Motorola S10 HD Bluetooth behind the ear headphones. After the first pair died within a few months and got replaced under warranty, the headphones continued to function well for almost another 2 years. This summer, the controls on headphones stopped working. So I was back to the drawing board to find headphones.

The headphones that attracted my attention were the JayBird BlueBuds X Headphones mostly because they had a “lifetime” warranty against sweat. (Lifetime being what they consider lifetime, so who knows how long that is.) The cost really put me off, so I set an alert on SlickDeals for them. When they came down in price a little bit, I jumped on them.

The headphones were easy to setup and I liked the audible feedback when they were connected. I had a little trouble getting the headphones to stay in, but using the over the ear method of setup (they call it an advanced setup), I managed to get them to work a lot better. The first pair I had died within a week and Amazon was great about replacing them quickly.

I’ve been running with them for a few months now and I like how they sound, but still check them all the time to make sure they didn’t fall out. I really liked the way the Motorola headphones hugged my head, but I also found that I had marks on my head after every run where they squeezed my head. I’m still not convinced that these headphones are the perfect headphones for working out, but they are working OK for me.

Pros

  • Audible feedback
  • Very light
  • Lifetime warranty against sweat killing them

Cons

  • Fall out too easily
  • Very expensive
  • Long term reliability is unknown

Summary

There are a bunch of options for workout headphones these days and the BlueBuds X are not the be all, end all headphones for me. They are acceptable for me and I’m not going to look for another pair of headphones. However, I can’t recommend these headphones due to the cost and the fact that I can’t keep them in my ears all the time. I wish there was a perfect pair of headphones, but so far, I haven’t found them.