New Math

I've gotten a bit fed up with our local paper in that the content is decreasing very rapidly (the quality of the content was always questionable). We decided today that we'd goto Sunday only if it was significantly cheaper. I called and was told that Sunday only was $9/month; we currently pay $11.25/month for every day. I said that I wanted to cancel, so the lady on the phone said that we could get Friday-Sunday for $6/month. Hmmm, so for $3 less per month, we get 2 more days than Sunday alone? I don't get it, but decided we'll go for it for awhile.

Our dog will probably be bummed about this as he gets the paper every morning. We'll just have to throw one out there for him to bring back.

Well, then, there

Well, then, there

My wife said this today as a retort to something I said. I'm still scratching my head figuring out what she meant. I'm not sure she knows, either.

Lottery

One of the propositions on the upcoming California ballot is about changing how the lottery works and increases advertising for the lottery. I have read the pros and cons of the proposition and no one has mentioned that lotteries are effectively a tax on those can't afford it. (A friend of mine has called lotteries a tax on those that can't do math.) In many cases, low income people play the lottery in the hopes that they'll win. While there is nothing wrong with hoping, the reality is that people will keep playing the lottery despite the odds.

Increasing advertising of the lottery will add a tax burden to low income people. This is probably the best reason I can think of to vote against this proposition; we don't need increased advertising for the lottery and don't need to encourage more people to play it. How about some real solutions instead of this hidden tax?

Ripped off

About a month ago when we had our major plumbing problem, we just picked a plumber to do the work and didn't shop around. We didn't have much of a choice as we needed the water back on. We chose Rescue Rooter and the plumber did a good job. When he was doing the work, I was trying to do some calculations to see what it really should have cost based on say $85/hour for a plumber (that's what I was charged in the past for non-emergency work). The plumber said the rate was the same if it was an emergency or non-emergency. The repair cost a lot, but I started to forget about it.

On Friday, I had Rescue Rooter come out to give me an estimate on putting a T in the main water line to hook up sprinklers to prepare for redoing our front lawn. I almost fell over when he gave me the estimate. It was $520. He knocked $50 off and I said I'd get other estimates. I got a call back and the price dropped to $395. Still, this seemed way out of line. I had already dug the hole to expose the pipe, there was maybe $50 in parts and worst case 2 hours of work. At $100/hour, that's a total (including parts) of $250. I just got an estimate from another plumber (without seeing it) of around $200; this estimate is much more in line with what I'd expect.

So, it looks like Rescue Rooter ripped me off big time to fix our plumbing issue. Of course, there is nothing I can do about it except write this post. Bottom line, even in a plumbing emergency, shop around if you think the number is out of line. In addition, don't use Rescue Rooter.