The failure of catchall email addresses

For years when I ran my own server, I made up email addresses for each site I visited and had to enter an email address. They were in the form of somedomain.com@mydomain.com. I then entered an alias into sendmail to forward the mail to me, rebuilt the alias file and all worked well. When I switched to Google for Domains, I couldn't move over those aliases as I had several hundred and Google limited the number of aliases, so I opted to just use a catchall address. As more and more spammers forge return addresses, the amount of "returned mail" I receive has increased. Spammers use addresses like jorge_1975@mydomain.com and when other servers reject it, I get the bounces. Over the last week, I received almost 25,000 pieces of spam and returned mail.

What do I do? Google's filters aren't sophisticated enough to let me only accept mail from *.com@mydomain.com, so I setup another account on my Google for domains to catch all the mail. I'm now in the process of setting up filters to forward legitimate mail to my main account. This isn't ideal, but at the moment, it is the only way to keep all this garbage out of my main mailbox. What is interesting is that it appears that Gmail's spam learning is on a per-account basis (at least partly) as my new account has only had a few pieces of spam make it threw even though it is getting the same stuff my other account received.

Now if Gmail supported wildcards in filters, this problem would be much easier to solve.

I can't give up my catchall address as I've forgotten all the sites I've signed up for and don't want to potentially lose stuff (like my bank statement), so I guess I'll just have to live with this current solution.

Very cute, UPS

A few weeks ago, I opened our front door to check the mail and discovered a package under the door mat.

In case you're wondering, a 10 pound box doesn't fit under a door mat very well.

EPSON, grumble, grumble, grumble

This weekend I finally had a chance to sit down with the EPSON CX9400 I picked up on Thursday. After hours upon hours of attempting to debug ReceiptWallet and figure out the problem, I finally came up with a workaround. It appears that the EPSON TWAIN data source doesn't close a few of its resources when the data source is closed. Then when the data source is opened again lots of stuff has taken place since the last scan potentially causing the data source to lose track of its resources (or maybe Carbon doesn't like trying to open the same resource more than once by the same plugin). In any case, I worked around this by not closing the data source for any EPSON scanner. I really, really dislike this solution, but I went through a lot of my code and tried removing chunks to see if they caused the issue and then eventually discovered that if I started a scan, closed the scan, then showed the thumbnail view (I normally show the list view), it would crash. So all the code I tested to see if it caused the crash really led me no where.

So, this proves to me (beyond a reasonable doubt) that the EPSON scanner driver is a piece of junk and causes lots of problems for ReceiptWallet users.

While I'm beating on EPSON, I decided to grab a screenshot of their latest user interface. This is 2008, not 2000 when I bought my last EPSON scanner. Can we at least get the buttons to be nice OS X buttons and use fonts that don't look like crap? This UI is completely unacceptable; it's kind of interesting that the Apple store doesn't sell any EPSON scanners or all-in-one devices (at least the online Apple store).

I recommend that Mac users stop buying EPSON devices (unfortunately I had to buy one to test) until EPSON decides to spend some money and fix the drivers. They are in such sorry shape, it isn't even funny.

High cost food isn't worth it

Last night, my wife and I went out to dinner at a nice restaurant. My sister had given me a gift card for my birthday, so we decided to use it. It was one of those restaurants where each entrée was over $25. Before we went, I kind of had a feeling I wouldn't be impressed as I'm usually underwhelmed when we spend a lot of money on meals; the quality is only OK and the portions leave me very hungry. This place was no exception; to top it off, I had to fork over a nice chunk of change on top of the gift card to cover the meal.

Why do restaurants think they can charge so much and deliver so little value? There is one nice restaurant we go to where the portions aren't that big, but the food is excellent. Maybe I just expect a good value for my meals.