<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Violating a privacy policy</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.gruby.com/2010/01/28/violating-a-privacy-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.gruby.com/2010/01/28/violating-a-privacy-policy/</link> <description>Another semi-useless spot on the web...</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:45:23 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Scott Gruby</title><link>http://blog.gruby.com/2010/01/28/violating-a-privacy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-15919</link> <dc:creator>Scott Gruby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:51:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gruby.com/?p=2444#comment-15919</guid> <description>While Duncan Hunter has the right to send me paper mail, I contacted him to tell him that it was a waste of paper and that he should try to preserve natural resources by not sending it and going electronic. As for him sending me a survey, this is typical politician behavior where laws are enacted to prevent business from doing slimy things, but allows politicians to do it. If a survey had been sent out by a business using names gathered where the privacy policy didn&#039;t say that they could be used for that purpose, the business would have been in trouble. Also, the survey had no way to opt-out, something that companies are not allowed to do and the company would have people all over them, including politicians.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Duncan Hunter has the right to send me paper mail, I contacted him to tell him that it was a waste of paper and that he should try to preserve natural resources by not sending it and going electronic. As for him sending me a survey, this is typical politician behavior where laws are enacted to prevent business from doing slimy things, but allows politicians to do it. If a survey had been sent out by a business using names gathered where the privacy policy didn't say that they could be used for that purpose, the business would have been in trouble. Also, the survey had no way to opt-out, something that companies are not allowed to do and the company would have people all over them, including politicians.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tyler</title><link>http://blog.gruby.com/2010/01/28/violating-a-privacy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-15918</link> <dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:55:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gruby.com/?p=2444#comment-15918</guid> <description>He&#039;s your Congressman, I don&#039;t understand what the big deal is. As a constituent, he was every right to send paper mailings to you, your address is public information when you register to vote.The  privacy policy is debatable, I would count a survey as &quot;information&quot; Plus, I believe can-spam pertains to only commercial/private sector mail</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He's your Congressman, I don't understand what the big deal is.<br /> As a constituent, he was every right to send paper mailings to you, your address is public information when you register to vote.</p><p>The  privacy policy is debatable, I would count a survey as "information"<br /> Plus, I believe can-spam pertains to only commercial/private sector mail</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: blog.gruby.com @ 2012-02-09 19:46:04 by W3 Total Cache -->
