Comments on: Time Machine saved my butt! http://blog.gruby.com/2008/01/30/time-machine-saved-my-butt/ Another semi-useless spot on the web... Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:45:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Scott Grubyhttp://blog.gruby.com/2008/01/30/time-machine-saved-my-butt/comment-page-1/#comment-11537 Scott Gruby Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:52:06 +0000 http://blog.gruby.com/2008/01/30/time-machine-saved-my-butt/#comment-11537 Hi Jon,While generally Interface Builder works, I have found it to crash at least once in each of my development sessions. In this particular case, I crashed Interface Builder at least once every 5 minutes when working trying to remove the existing connections. Your mileage with Interface Builder may vary. Hi Jon,

While generally Interface Builder works, I have found it to crash at least once in each of my development sessions. In this particular case, I crashed Interface Builder at least once every 5 minutes when working trying to remove the existing connections. Your mileage with Interface Builder may vary.

]]> By: Jon Hesshttp://blog.gruby.com/2008/01/30/time-machine-saved-my-butt/comment-page-1/#comment-11536 Jon Hess Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:44:47 +0000 http://blog.gruby.com/2008/01/30/time-machine-saved-my-butt/#comment-11536 "Interface Builder doesn’t handle issues such as trying to remove objects with existing connections…"The crash was unfortunate, but your assertion simply isn't true. "Interface Builder doesn’t handle issues such as trying to remove objects with existing connections…"

The crash was unfortunate, but your assertion simply isn't true.

]]> By: Scott Grubyhttp://blog.gruby.com/2008/01/30/time-machine-saved-my-butt/comment-page-1/#comment-11529 Scott Gruby Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:16:00 +0000 http://blog.gruby.com/2008/01/30/time-machine-saved-my-butt/#comment-11529 Hi Richard,I use the default 1 hour for Time Machine and it works well. The performance hit isn't all that bad as I don't change huge files every hour. From my understanding (and maybe some speculation), the next OS update will allow non-Time Capsule users to use Time Machine with an Airport Extreme base station. That would be stupid for Apple not to do this. When it does happen, I'll have to get a new base station as my old Airport Extreme saucer doesn't support hard drives. Hi Richard,

I use the default 1 hour for Time Machine and it works well. The performance hit isn't all that bad as I don't change huge files every hour. From my understanding (and maybe some speculation), the next OS update will allow non-Time Capsule users to use Time Machine with an Airport Extreme base station. That would be stupid for Apple not to do this. When it does happen, I'll have to get a new base station as my old Airport Extreme saucer doesn't support hard drives.

]]> By: Richardhttp://blog.gruby.com/2008/01/30/time-machine-saved-my-butt/comment-page-1/#comment-11523 Richard Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:57:06 +0000 http://blog.gruby.com/2008/01/30/time-machine-saved-my-butt/#comment-11523 Wow Scott, this is great news and like you, I use SD! daily for backups but this would be quite useful.What kind of frequency do you need to have TimeMachine set for to safely get this kind of peace of mind? And, if you have it set to do something every 15 minutes, what kind of performance hit to you take when it's working in the background?Do I understand from your post that Apple is going to update Leopard so that non-TimeCapsule users can use an new airport extreme base station and a connected hard disk with TM? Wow Scott, this is great news and like you, I use SD! daily for backups but this would be quite useful.

What kind of frequency do you need to have TimeMachine set for to safely get this kind of peace of mind? And, if you have it set to do something every 15 minutes, what kind of performance hit to you take when it's working in the background?

Do I understand from your post that Apple is going to update Leopard so that non-TimeCapsule users can use an new airport extreme base station and a connected hard disk with TM?

]]>