Flex Your Power signs off; coincidence?

The other day, I wrote about the highway signs saying “Flex Your Power” and using energy. Someone from the company that runs the “Flex Your Power” campaign (they’re a marketing/PR firm) commented that the signs served a valuable purpose. In my opinion, stating the obvious isn’t valuable. In any case, neither my wife nor I saw the signs lit up yesterday. Is it a coincidence that after my post they were turned off or was it that the energy usage dropped? While the energy usage did drop (drop in temperature), shouldn’t people still conserve energy?

I wonder how much money the state saved by turning off the signs. We’ve always been told to turn off the lights when we leave a room; now CalTrans is turning off the signs when it has nothing useful to say. (I’d be more than happy to accept a check for a portion of the money saved.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation